【 Weak current College 】 project cost audit of the common methods

Audit is an investment cost of authenticity of the audit work. Audit departments in building engineering cost control and management of the various links in full control, control and oversight role, is to ensure the authenticity, objectivity, and to work fast and efficient to implement to enhance audit quality, the maximum savings audit costs, improve the efficiency of the audit work, according to the characteristics of different construction projects take different audit approaches become particularly important.

1. comprehensive audit law. Means in accordance with national or industry budget quota of construction of the order or the order, one by one all the way to the review. The specific calculation methods and review process and prepare construction budget is basically the same. The advantage of this approach is comprehensive, detailed, audited project cost errors less, quality is high, but the workload is large, for smaller quantities, the process is relatively simple, cost preparation or quoted unit technical strength is weak or even prestige lower units shall be comprehensive audit law.

2. the standard maps audit law. Refers to the use of standard drawings or General drawings of the project, the first centralized audit forces prepare standard budget or accounts cost as a standard method of comparing auditing. According to the standard drawings design or engineering General drawings can be centralized audit forces a fine review budget cost, as the standard drawing standard cost, or use the standard amount of engineering drawings, control and audit, on different sections and design change part of a separate review. The advantage of this approach is that time is short, the effect is good, yet easily. The disadvantage is only applicable in accordance with the standard drawings design or construction of the project, scope of application.

3. the group calculates audit law. This is a way to speed up the project of audit rate method. That the constituent units of the basic elements of a sub-item project is divided into several groups, and adjacent and have certain inherent links project as a group, audit calculations in the same group of a sub-item project, use the quantities have the same or similar calculated on the basis of the relationship, the judgment of the same group as other several sub-item project calculation accuracy.

4. comparative audit law. Means used have been audited project cost the same to compare similar trial audit of the project. This method should generally be based on the works of different conditions and characteristics of discrimination. First, two engineering drawings using the same, but the base part and field conditions and changes. The proposed audit project based some of the above comparative audit method may be used; different parts can be calculated or use the appropriate method of auditing. The second is the same as the two engineering design, the construction area. According to the two engineering construction area ratio and two works by part works basically the same proportion of the characteristics, the two engineering cost per m2 of construction area, and each square meters construction area of each sub-project engineering conduct comparative review, if you are basically the same, the proposed audit project cost is correct, or to the audit of the sub-project quantities are correct. On the contrary, the proposed tribunal cost problems, should identify the causes of error, corrected. Third, the proposed tribunal engineering and approved projects of the same size, but the design drawings not identical, to the same part, such as building the pillars, room racks, roof, brick wall, for quantities of audit, you cannot compare the sub-project engineering calculation according to drawings or visa.