【 Weak current College 】 project clearing summary (2)

Part a, settlement
1. a project (as fixed pricing) contract basis by real clearing, settlement and found its base Groove excavation width is greater than the fixed quantity calculation rules (i.e. Basic base width plus face), building units and construction units had differences, construction unit that, beyond the fixed quantity calculation rules that belong to the construction measures, in accordance with the contract shall not exceed the design part of the "measure", the only authorized according to the fixed quantity calculation rule calculates the amount of engineering and construction units. considers that, since the contract is for "press" will be settled according to the actual width of the base channel. I ask you: 1), what is "by real settlement"? what? 2), the project's base channel how settlement?
Answer: 1, according to the actual settlement refers to the construction according to norm request, complete a survival of actual consumption of workload or cost.
2-slot settlement first over-excavation part of the reason, if the landlord over-excavation partly because or force majeure, the need for design change or Visa, construction, followed by the actual amount of the settlement. If this is the reason because of the construction party, you may think that it does not follow the specification construction, should be the rule.
2, there is a project of the clearing work, many changes and visa, the visa calculation now understand the differences, the differences are as follows: increase a work visa fee $ 53000 but did not indicate whether to include all the costs, the calculations are included in direct costs to calculate profits, tax, or directly included in the cost before tax, or directly included in the tax cost? in addition because the owner has a discount of 8%, will the visa section is also offers?
Answer: 1, visa is for actual costs incurred, General visa simply Additionally calculate tax, which is directly included in the cost before tax.
2. visa section whether discount depends on the contract, if agreed by contract execution, if you do not agree, you will need to consult parties. In General, the concessions for the project, and visa is also included in the total cost of individual projects, it also needs to be in.
3, have a project, in the tender quantities of independent Foundation digging description as follows: "dig Foundation Earth work three types of soil base type: independent Foundation layer bottom area: 1.8m * 2.0m digging depth: 2.7m spoil distance: to consider groundwater:-1.2", according to drawing a clear area of the independent Foundation is the Foundation 1.8M * 2.0M, bottom elevation-2.7 m not wrong-but in a separate description of the concrete foundation, "independent cushion material type, thickness: 100 thick C15 plain concrete cushion, 1000 thick sand cushion, radical edge all out 50CM, concrete strength grade: C25". Want to ask you, an independent foundation construction has been completed, by describing what the independent Foundation "1000 thick sand cushion, radical edge all out 50CM" in earthwork checkout can count?
A: according to the pricing norms, digging the Foundation Earth work list item quantity is a "cushion area * excavated deep", digging deep from the cushion the bottom of the calculations, the bottom edge of the area should be calculated based on all of the project amount, 50CM while digging deep should calculate the pad thickness.
As a result of the above cases only lists list of project features, and does not indicate the party a to provide the earthwork is press "cushion area * dig deep (cushion the bottom)", so not good judgement of the Party of leaks. Construction party needs to verify that the leak is that if you do need to put together this party a partial quantity.
4, lump sum price met new project to add construction measures fees, such as the new wall, to calculate the scaffold?
A: you should read the contract. Normally a lump sum price does not include new project released, add new items, if because the construction sparked additional construction charges (generally refers to technical measures fees), you need to calculate.
5. I is located in a water purification plant project, recently encountered a problem, we at Earth excavation organizations not formally submitted to the supervision and supervision by the owners, and owners ' consent for earth-moving large excavation, Foundation digging depth 4.5M, delicious and long 98M wide 46.5M, one side of the excavation was completed with a production of the sink stack before the excavation of the pool, our oral request near the sink stack pool side as designed to play two rows of steel sheet pile, but the owners and management to cost is too high, so we refuse to take the form of a natural slope, after due to excavation near the sink stack pool side of earth-moving part of collapse and unequal settlement, resulting in a stack of original sink scum, earthwork drainpipe immersion in water, large-area collapsed after the accident of our measures to remedy, near the sink stack pool a focus on new playing two rows of steel sheet piling and make concrete revetment, transferred to four pumps for pumping. Afterwards we claim, but the supervision and owners to the following two grounds for refusing a visa:
(1) our earthwork construction organization is after the accident was formally submitted to the supervision
(2) supervision and owners oral refused to play two rows of steel sheet piles, but did not refuse to make a row of steel sheet piles on the grounds that is due to our construction organization incomplete, not lead to the construction measures.
Will the supervision reasons justified? we can claim?
A: If you are from the written material, supervision and owners of reason is reasonable construction party cannot claim. Specific causes are as follows: 1. construction requirements to play two rows of steel sheet pile, but the owners and management to cost is too high, on the grounds of refusal. But the owners do not have told you not to take effective measures to prevent accidents, from problem surface can be seen as the owners want to party to take measures for low cost, but the party did not continue to raise rationalization proposals, and taking measures of natural slope does not guarantee good construction quality. So party to bear the primary responsibility. 2. party b's Earth-moving and construction organizations is after the accident was formally submitted to the supervision on owners and party b has no identity of supervision of the construction plan, not forming a formal agreement, so b is not a consensus and owner supervision of construction, the consequences of course assume responsibility by party b.
6, according to blueprints implementation before the existence of design changes, ask to rework a visa should check range is what has been done inThe dismantling of the part you want to keep the design change requests back to implement part of it as one element of a visa? For example, the original blueprint for 200 thick wall, 2.9M high. Change down before have done 2M high, and now the change request to 120 thick, then my visa range should have done 2M high thick brick wall 240, dismantling costs. Then retrace the change request implementation of 120 thick walls are changes directly into a settlement or a visa?
A: part already completed construction because all waste, according to rework the completion of the project in combination with the terms of the contract, the calculated artificial fee, material fee, mechanical; additionally need to calculate the cost of removal, demolition of parts required to complete, to calculate the corresponding the artificial, mechanical charges (if any), waste removal costs; as regards the design changes, new construction section (120 thick walls), can not visa in the future, according to the design change orders directly into the settlement.
7, do the installation cost, the actual wiring pipeline often differ with drawings, drawing the picture of a pipeline to see the clarity, will avoid cross, so the difference between the actual construction, we think should be the actual pipeline toward settlement. But the construction is to insist that the settlement in accordance with the drawings and the completion of the drawings is painted, we completed construction drawings is painting, our Engineering Department will not look to sign up, this is the actual settlement or clearing by the completion of the drawings?
Answer: this is a universal problem, shouldn't the figure of plumbing, capacity will be less, electrical appliances, the actual design is only a schematic representation, so it should be according to the actual calculation of optimal routes, such as plumbing risers, shall be conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the distance from the wall to determine the size of the flat tube is unique, electrical engineering, shortest distance, it is best to have the hidden information, according to the information to calculate, there will be no differences.
8. a fixed price contract (inventory), the contract only conventions: If design changes, design changes, changes in the cost caused by the increase and decrease the amount of the sum and total price than ± 5% or less are not adjusted. If the original contract price to 100 000, design changes cost increase of 8 million, change in the price exceeds the original contract price of ± 5%, then the settlement price should = 100 + 8 = 108 million, or = 100 + (8-5) = 103 million?
A: the contract for more than 5% of cases no detailed instructions may actually cause both sides understand ambiguity. Ambiguity, followed by the spirit of contract law could be interpreted in favour of the contractor's method, that is at full adjustment.